Sunday, May 31, 2026

Will FOIA Trial Allow Public to See What Lauren Underwood was Doing behind her Revolving Door?

On May 21, 2026, Federal District Court Judge Matthew Kennelly made history. Very few civil lawsuits go to trial. And when it comes to those brought under the Freedom of Information Act, the number each year is even smaller.   

Indeed, a 2011 study by Margaret Kwoka shows that for nine years, the number was exactly zero

 


cont.

 

His patience with inadequate declarations worn thin, Judge Kennelly produced a litigation unicorn: an order for a FOIA trial!  At present it is scheduled for June 22, 2026 in the courtroom of Judge Kennelly.  Details will be posted on his calendar.

The underlying requests are connected to reporting I did a few years ago, when I discovered Underwood had introduced a bill purporting to be for an electronic health records database and for the benefit of migrant children. The truth was very different, as I explained here in 2019 and then in more detail in early 2020, in an article co-authored with John Washington and published in The Intercept.  

In the summer of 2020, Rep. Underwood was at it again. Following our reporting, the Senate did not pass Underwood's bill, and Underwood updated her campaign finance disclosure, confirming our information that she had underreported her payouts from the kleptocratic NextLevel insurance firm, after she refused to comment on this for our article.  

Underwood may have been lackadaisacal in her financial disclosures, but her diligence on behalf of the surveillance indstury would be rewarded: the House leadership in 2020 promoted the second term member of Congress to the powerful House Appropriations Subcommittee on Homeland Security.  In her new position, she introduced her surveillance industry bill, again using the framing of "health" to fund a project that creates a massive biometric database,  provides no health benefits to migrants, and was opposed the immigrant rights groups in 2019.  

Underwood's persistence as a corporate lackey prompted my curiosity.  She ran as a nurse and a health care advocate, but in her first term was Vice Chair of the Homeland Security Committee and on no health services committees.  

What exactly had been going on with NextLevel?, I wondered. 

A few years and more state court litigation later, I had some answers. The long story of an insurance executive who campaigned as a nurse, in nurses scrubs and a stethsoscope, is here.  (My shorthand description of Underwood: "the George Santos of Illinois.") 

The records provide a case study of what happens to billions of taxpayer funds that are targeted for health care, showing how they end up in the pockets of Underwood and her bosses and not the health care providers for the Medicaid enrollees in Cook County, Illinois, in this case.  

The account above also has links to previously sealed records unredacted following my First Amendment litigation, as well as a link to the litigation. (In short, the firm was secretly declared insolvent, and the public has no idea about what happened to hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars, though we do now know some of the players who made this happen, including a Chicago Tribune CEO and officials at the Fortune 50 firm Centene that took over NextLevel's membership and contracts during secret conservation proceedings.

Meanwhile, I was waiting on responses to some FOIA requests. Prior to working for NextLevel, Underwood had been working for Health and Human Services, including at one point on insurance markets. Wouldn't it be interesting to see exactly what Underwood was up to in her first years in the Obama administration, before revolving into the industry whose rules it appeared she was earlier creating? 

As often is the case, the agencies originally provided exactly nothing.  And then, even after litigation, the FOIA searches seemed more concerned with avoiding than locating responsive records. 

In another FOIA case for this same proceeding, Judge Kennelly found against Immigration and Customs Enforcement and ordered they release in their entirety thousands of pages without redactions.  ICE appealed. The appeal is fully briefed and we are awaiting an order.  (You can read an overview of the issues for that and another case now also on appeal in our motion to consolidate.)  The motion was denied, but it was referenced by Judge Kness in a recent hearing for another case and provides a synoposis of the problems with our current FOIA case law.    

Many thanks to the amazing attorneys representing me in this litigation: Nicolette Glazer, Rima Kapitan, Dan Melo, and Andrew Free.  

 

 

 

  

Friday, March 20, 2026

What Crazy Fact about the Rate of Trump's Unlawful Detentions did I just Learn from CourtListener, Thanks to Dan Kowalski and the Rest of the Fabulous Attorneys and Judges Defending the Rule of Law?

Habeas Challenges Increase by 4,119%    

To date under Trump II, about 23,000 habeas motions were filed on behalf of people in ICE Custody (1/21/2025 - 3/20/2026)



Click to Enlarge



Under Biden, for the Exact Same Period, 535 Habeas Motions were filed on behalf of people in ICE custody

   
Click to Enlarge

Prompted by Dan Kowalski's listserve blast with the subject heading: "81-year-old Judge Leonie Helen Milhomme Brinkema is NOT HAVING IT!" I read the court order, and some others on recent habeas relief.  As I was musing as to the number of habeas cases brought under Trump, compared to Biden, I realized the answer was readily available via the awesome CourtListener interface (every lawyer reading this needs to add "RECAP" to your browser).   



 


 






 

Thursday, March 19, 2026

Federal District Court Swats Down Customs and Border Protection Excuse to Delay FOIA Briefing

The Underwood Files 

 

Insurance Executive Lauren Underwood (aka "the George Santos of Illinois") 
Campaigning for Congress (2018)

Sharing minute order of Northern District of Illinois Judge Matthew Kennelly, denying motion by Assistant U.S. Attorney Alex Hartzler to delay Customs and Border Protection briefing: 

...As plaintiff points out in her response, the claimed lapse in appropriations, if there is one that actually impacts this matter, has existed since mid-February and should have been brought to the Court's attention earlier. Even if that were not the case, there is no appropriate basis in a case already more than five years old for further delays. The Court made this abundantly clear to the parties in its 2/19/2026 order (dkt. 208). CBP has two choices at this point: file a motion for summary judgment, by the 3/20/2026 deadline, based on what it is able to muster by that date, or forego doing so, and await plaintiff's anticipated motion for summary judgment, which is due on 4/3/2026, and respond to that motion. The Court also notes that if plainiff does not file a motion for summary judgment, or files one that is denied, CBP will have the ability to move for judgment as a matter of law under Rule 50(a) during the upcoming bench trial. (mk)
1:22-cv-05072 , Dkt 211

Here is the motion opposing CBP, filed by my attorney, Rima Kapitan.  
Thanks to attorneys Andrew Free and Dan Melo for their insights and to Nicolette Glazer for representing me in the litigation for Health and Human Services records in this case. 

(More on fake nurse Lauren Underwood here.)   

Thursday, March 12, 2026

ICE Releases Hundreds of its Detention Subfield Office Addresses and Phone Numbers, Following Court Order

 ICE, We Know Where to Find You! 
Release from Deportation Research Clinic, Buffett Institute for Global Affairs, Northwestern University


 Chicago Sample List from 1,250 Rows of ICE Subfield Offices Nationwide  
For entire spreadsheet, click here

 

Chicago Sample List of ICE Addresses and Phone Numbers 

click to enlarge, or download spreadsheet


Backstory
In 2009, I encountered an ICE report indicating that ICE had 186 "subfield offices," meaning locations with holding cells designed for 24 hours or less.  I filed a request of ICE requesting a list of their locations.  
 
When I received the list, I was stunned to learn that one of the locations was in the Chelsea Market, a couple blocks from my apartment.  The Chelsea Market is a tourist scene, not to mention home to the Food Network and other glam enterprises.  You can read about my conversation with the guy running the U.S. Marshal operation and coordinating on the third floor with ICE's Fugitive Operations in The Nation, "America's Secret ICE Castles."  The guy in charge  did not appreciate my pointing out that he was using Rachel Ray as a human shield and asked me not to reveal their operations, a request I turned down.  Here's a link to the list and story from 2009.  

About ten years later, I was looking at a release of similar list posted on the National Immigrant Justice Center.  Except it was too short and no addresses or phone numbers were included.

ICE's response to my request for the data for the missing fields was an unreadable PDF.  After years of litigation, and a court order from Illinois Northern District Court Judge Mary Rowland, ICE coughed up this list.  The contact information and specification of responsibilities should be helpful to those trying to assist folks ICE is arresting.
 
Many thanks to my FOIA attorney Nicolette Glazer.  The Deportation Research Clinic operates on a miniscule budget and the work of intrepid undergraduate research assistants, who draft our complaints and analyze productions.  Thanks to Gabriel Sanchez, Class of 2026, who worked on this litigation and many other cases.  
Please consider  supporting our work.      
 
Update, March 13, 2026 - The spreadsheet does not include the 88 Tenth Ave., NYC (Chelsea Market) location where ICE previously operated.  Turns out that the U.S. Marshals et al. relocated a few years ago to Brooklyn.  The new address and phone numbers are listed in the recently released spreadsheet as "NYC ECP" (Enforcement Criminal Prosecutions).